Matthew Paul Mikula v. State
This text of Matthew Paul Mikula v. State (Matthew Paul Mikula v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-19-00344-CR
MATTHEW PAUL MIKULA, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 13th District Court1 Navarro County, Texas Trial Court No. D37990-CR, Honorable James E. Lagomarsino, Presiding
December 20, 2019
ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS, JJ.
Appellant Matthew Paul Mikula, proceeding pro se, appeals his conviction of theft
from a human corpse or grave2 and sentence to eleven months’ confinement in a state
jail facility. The appellate record was due on November 4, 2019. The clerk’s record was
filed by this date, but the reporter’s record was not. On November 4, the reporter notified
1 Originally appealed to the Tenth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the
Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013).
2 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 31.03(e)(4)(B) (West 2019). the Court that appellant had not requested preparation or made payment arrangements
for the reporter’s record. TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(b)(2), (b)(3). By letter that day, we directed
appellant to request preparation and make acceptable payment arrangements for the
reporter’s record by November 14. Failure to do so, we advised, could result in the appeal
being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Appellant
has not requested preparation or made payment arrangements for the reporter’s record
to date.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(2). Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize
whatever means it finds necessary to determine the following:
(1) whether appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
(2) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to the appointment of appellate counsel;
(3) whether appellant is entitled to have the reporter’s record furnished without charge;
(4) if appellant is not entitled to have the reporter’s record furnished without charge, the date appellant will make acceptable payment arrangements for the reporter’s record; and
(5) what orders, if any, should be entered to assure that the reporter’s record will be promptly filed and that the appeal will be diligently pursued.
If it is determined that appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent,
and is entitled to appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint appellate counsel. The
name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of appointed
counsel shall be provided to the Clerk of this Court. The trial court shall also cause to be
developed a clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and a
2 reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at any hearing held.
The hearing record shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before January 21,
2020.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Matthew Paul Mikula v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-paul-mikula-v-state-texapp-2019.