Matthew N. Mezzanotte v. Joseph E. Bruno and Daisy Hilleary

181 F.2d 279, 86 U.S. App. D.C. 412
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 13, 1950
Docket10014
StatusPublished

This text of 181 F.2d 279 (Matthew N. Mezzanotte v. Joseph E. Bruno and Daisy Hilleary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthew N. Mezzanotte v. Joseph E. Bruno and Daisy Hilleary, 181 F.2d 279, 86 U.S. App. D.C. 412 (D.C. Cir. 1950).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a summary judgment for the defendant (appellee) in an action by appellant to declare a trust and for accounting, etc., in connection with the purchase and sale of real estate. In our opinion the pleadings and relevant affidavits support the conclusion of the trial court that no trust relationship prevailed between the parties. As the suit was founded upon this basis, we think the court was right in entering its judgment for defendant. Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 F.2d 279, 86 U.S. App. D.C. 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-n-mezzanotte-v-joseph-e-bruno-and-daisy-hilleary-cadc-1950.