Matthew N. Mezzanotte v. Joseph E. Bruno and Daisy Hilleary

D.C. Circuit

Matthew N. Mezzanotte v. Joseph E. Bruno and Daisy Hilleary

181 F.2d 279, 86 U.S. App. D.C. 412

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 13, 1950·No. 10014·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a summary judgment for the defendant (appellee) in an action by appellant to declare a trust and for accounting, etc., in connection with the purchase and sale of real estate. In our opinion the pleadings and relevant affidavits support the conclusion of the trial court that no trust relationship prevailed between the parties. As the suit was founded upon this basis, we think the court was right in entering its judgment for defendant. Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a summary judgment for the defendant (appellee) in an action by appellant to declare a trust and for accounting, etc., in connection with the purchase and sale of real estate. In our opinion the pleadings and relevant affidavits support the conclusion of the trial court that no trust relationship prevailed between the parties. As the suit was founded upon this basis, we think the court was right in entering its judgment for defendant. Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.

Matthew N. Mezzanotte v. Joseph E. Bruno and Daisy Hilleary, 181 F.2d 279, 86 U.S. App. D.C. 412 (D.C. Cir. 1950).

Pincite

181 F.2d 279 (Matthew N. Mezzanotte v. Joseph E. Bruno and Daisy Hilleary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.