Matthew Marshall v. Julie L. Jones, etc.
This text of 226 So. 3d 211 (Matthew Marshall v. Julie L. Jones, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Petitioner Matthew Marshall has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, challenging the constitutionality of his death sentence, which was based upon a judicial override. See Marshall v. State, 604 So.2d 799, 802 (Fla. 1992). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(9), Fla. Const. Because Marshall’s sentence became final before Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), was decided, he is not entitled to relief. See Asay v. State, 210 So.3d 1 (Fla. 2016). Accordingly, we deny the petition.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 So. 3d 211, 2017 WL 1739246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-marshall-v-julie-l-jones-etc-fla-2017.