Matthew Marshall v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

226 So. 3d 211, 2017 WL 1739246
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 4, 2017
DocketSC16-779
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 226 So. 3d 211 (Matthew Marshall v. Julie L. Jones, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthew Marshall v. Julie L. Jones, etc., 226 So. 3d 211, 2017 WL 1739246 (Fla. 2017).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Matthew Marshall has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, challenging the constitutionality of his death sentence, which was based upon a judicial override. See Marshall v. State, 604 So.2d 799, 802 (Fla. 1992). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(9), Fla. Const. Because Marshall’s sentence became final before Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), was decided, he is not entitled to relief. See Asay v. State, 210 So.3d 1 (Fla. 2016). Accordingly, we deny the petition.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur, CANADY, J., concurs in result. LABARGA, C.J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael T. Rivera v. State of Florida
260 So. 3d 920 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
Walton v. State
246 So. 3d 246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
James Ernest Hitchcock v. State of Florida
226 So. 3d 216 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)
Edward J. Zakrzewski, II v. Julie L. Jones, etc.
221 So. 3d 1159 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 So. 3d 211, 2017 WL 1739246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-marshall-v-julie-l-jones-etc-fla-2017.