Matthew Levinson v. Board of Regents, et al.

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA MATTHEW LEVINSON, Case No.: 2:26-cv-0088 1-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Denying Motions v. BOARD OF REGENGTS, et al., [ECF Nos. 4, 6, 13, 15, 20] 7 Defendants 8 Magistrate Judge Weksler recommends that I deny plaintiff Matthew Levinson’s motions 9|| for a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, a protective order, and ’Marshall 10] Enforcement.” ECF No. 20 at 5-6. No objection has been filed to those recommendations and time to do so has expired. I am not required to conduct “any review at all ... of any issue that 12})is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. 13}| Reyna—Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[T]he district judge must review the 14|| magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 15] otherwise.”’). Because there is no objection to Judge Weksler’s recommendations, I accept them. 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 20) is accepted and Levinson’s pending motions (ECF Nos. 4, 6, 13, and 15) are denied. 19 DATED this 29th day of May, 2026. 20

a ANDREWP.GORDON. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE