Matthew Kiman, and United States, Intervenor v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections
332 F.3d 29, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11855, 2003 WL 21361676
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedJune 13, 2003
Docket02-1099
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases
This text of 332 F.3d 29 (Matthew Kiman, and United States, Intervenor v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Matthew Kiman, and United States, Intervenor v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections, 332 F.3d 29, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11855, 2003 WL 21361676 (1st Cir. 2003).
Opinion
JUDGMENT OF THE EN BANC COURT
This appeal having been considered by the court en banc, the judgment of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kiman v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections
451 F.3d 274 (First Circuit, 2006)
Buchanan v. Maine
377 F. Supp. 2d 276 (D. Maine, 2005)
Kiman v. NH DOC
D. New Hampshire, 2005
Scott v. Androscoggin County Jail
2004 ME 143 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2004)
Tracy Miller v. Ronald King
449 F.3d 1149 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
United States v. King
384 F.3d 1248 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
Kiman v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections
541 U.S. 1059 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
332 F.3d 29, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11855, 2003 WL 21361676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-kiman-and-united-states-intervenor-v-new-hampshire-department-of-ca1-2003.