Matthew Kiman, and United States, Intervenor v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections
332 F.3d 29, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11855, 2003 WL 21361676
Opinion
JUDGMENT OF THE EN BANC COURT
This appeal having been considered by the court en banc, the judgment of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matthew Kiman, and United States, Intervenor v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections, 332 F.3d 29, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11855, 2003 WL 21361676 (1st Cir. 2003).
332 F.3d 29 (Matthew Kiman, and United States, Intervenor v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kiman v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections
451 F.3d 274 (First Circuit, 2006)
Buchanan v. Maine
377 F. Supp. 2d 276 (D. Maine, 2005)
Kiman v. NH DOC
D. New Hampshire, 2005
Scott v. Androscoggin County Jail
2004 ME 143 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2004)
Tracy Miller v. Ronald King
449 F.3d 1149 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
United States v. King
384 F.3d 1248 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
Kiman v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections
541 U.S. 1059 (Supreme Court, 2004)