Matthew Joiner v. State
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 18, 2018
No. 04-16-00701-CR
Matthew JOINER, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CR10594 Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Appellant has filed a pro se motion for to abate appeal and a pro se motion for leave to file a second supplemental brief. Appellant is represented by appointed counsel on appeal. In Texas, appellants do not have a right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Therefore, appellant’s motions are DENIED.
Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of January, 2018.
KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matthew Joiner v. State (Matthew Joiner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.