Matthew Joiner v. State
This text of Matthew Joiner v. State (Matthew Joiner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 18, 2018
No. 04-16-00701-CR
Matthew JOINER, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CR10594 Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding
ORDER Appellant has filed a pro se motion for to abate appeal and a pro se motion for leave to file a second supplemental brief. Appellant is represented by appointed counsel on appeal. In Texas, appellants do not have a right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Therefore, appellant’s motions are DENIED.
_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of January, 2018.
___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Matthew Joiner v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-joiner-v-state-texapp-2018.