Matthew Jamal Jackson v. State

Opinion

The State o

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 5, 2015

No. 04-15-00655-CR

Matthew Jamal JACKSON, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CR0148 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant has filed a pro se motion for substitution of counsel. The motion is DENIED. See United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 151 (2006) (“[T]he right to counsel of choice does not extend to defendants who require counsel to be appointed for them.”); Maes v. State, 275 S.W.3d 68, 71 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, no pet.) (“A defendant does not have the right to choose appointed counsel . . . .”).

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of November, 2015.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court