Matthew Jacob Guzman v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Matthew Jacob Guzman v. the State of Texas

DecidedSeptember 8, 2022

Docket11-21-00002-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Matthew Jacob Guzman v. the State of Texas (Matthew Jacob Guzman v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matthew Jacob Guzman v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Matthew Jacob Guzman, * From the 441st District Court of Midland County, Trial Court No. CR40647.

Vs. No. 11-21-00002-CR * September 8, 2022

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there are errors in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we modify the trial court’s judgment of January 4, 2021, revoking Appellant’s regular community supervision, to delete the assessment of attorney’s fees against Appellant. We modify the clerk’s bill of costs to delete whatever portion of the $9,200 in attorney’s fees is attributable to legal services rendered by Appellant’s appointed counsel in defense against the State’s motion to revoke filed on March 3, 2020. As modified, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Matthew Jacob Guzman, * From the 441st District Court of Midland County, Trial Court No. CR40647.

Vs. No. 11-21-00002-CR * September 8, 2022

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there are errors in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we modify the trial court’s judgment of January 4, 2021, revoking Appellant’s regular community supervision, to delete the assessment of attorney’s fees against Appellant. We modify the clerk’s bill of costs to delete whatever portion of the $9,200 in attorney’s fees is attributable to legal services rendered by Appellant’s appointed counsel in defense against the State’s motion to revoke filed on March 3, 2020. As modified, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Matthew Jacob Guzman v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-jacob-guzman-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.