Matthew J. Sikora Jr v. IRS
This text of Matthew J. Sikora Jr v. IRS (Matthew J. Sikora Jr v. IRS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 99-1762 ___________
Matthew Joseph Sikora, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Nebraska. Internal Revenue Service; Commissioner * of Internal Revenue Service; Nebraska * [UNPUBLISHED] Department of Revenue, * * Appellees. * ___________
Submitted: April 7, 1999 Filed: April 9, 1999 ___________
Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Matthew Joseph Sikora, Jr. appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his complaint for failure to effect proper service of process within 120 days under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Although over 120 days passed after Sikora filed his complaint, and the court gave Sikora an extension of time to effect proper service, see Bullock v. United States, 160 F.3d 441, 442 (8th Cir. 1998) (per curiam); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(a)-(c), 4(i), 4(m), Sikora failed to show good cause for his continuing failure to effect service, see Lujano v. Omaha Pub. Power Dist., 30 F.3d 1032, 1035 (8th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Matthew J. Sikora Jr v. IRS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-j-sikora-jr-v-irs-ca8-1999.