Matthew J. Sikora Jr v. IRS

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 9, 1999·No. 99-1762·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 99-1762 ___________

Matthew Joseph Sikora, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Nebraska. Internal Revenue Service; Commissioner * of Internal Revenue Service; Nebraska * [UNPUBLISHED] Department of Revenue, * * Appellees. * ___________

Submitted: April 7, 1999 Filed: April 9, 1999 ___________

Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Joseph Sikora, Jr. appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his complaint for failure to effect proper service of process within 120 days under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Although over 120 days passed after Sikora filed his complaint, and the court gave Sikora an extension of time to effect proper service, see Bullock v. United States, 160 F.3d 441, 442 (8th Cir. 1998) (per curiam); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(a)-(c), 4(i), 4(m), Sikora failed to show good cause for his continuing failure to effect service, see Lujano v. Omaha Pub. Power Dist., 30 F.3d 1032, 1035 (8th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matthew J. Sikora Jr v. IRS, (8th Cir. 1999).

Matthew J. Sikora Jr v. IRS (Matthew J. Sikora Jr v. IRS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniel R. Lujano v. Omaha Public Power District
30 F.3d 1032 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
Tommie Bullock v. United States
160 F.3d 441 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)