Matthew J. Clark v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Matthew J. Clark v. State of Florida

183 So. 3d 467, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 726, 2016 WL 231498

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 2016·No. 4D15-2388·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals an order denying a rule 3.801 motion to correct jail credit and seeks review of an order denying his motion for extension of time to move for rehearing. Although the defendant stated good cause for an extension of time, we affirm because he was not entitled to relief under rule 3.801 as.a matter of law. Our affirmance is without prejudice for him to file a timely rule 3.850 motion'if he can state a sufficient claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, GROSS and MAY, JJ., • concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals an order denying a rule 3.801 motion to correct jail credit and seeks review of an order denying his motion for extension of time to move for rehearing. Although the defendant stated good cause for an extension of time, we affirm because he was not entitled to relief under rule 3.801 as.a matter of law. Our affirmance is without prejudice for him to file a timely rule 3.850 motion'if he can state a sufficient claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, GROSS and MAY, JJ., • concur.

Matthew J. Clark v. State of Florida, 183 So. 3d 467, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 726, 2016 WL 231498 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

183 So. 3d 467 (Matthew J. Clark v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.