Matthew J. Clark v. State of Florida

183 So. 3d 467, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 726, 2016 WL 231498
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 20, 2016
Docket4D15-2388
StatusPublished

This text of 183 So. 3d 467 (Matthew J. Clark v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthew J. Clark v. State of Florida, 183 So. 3d 467, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 726, 2016 WL 231498 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals an order denying a rule 3.801 motion to correct jail credit and seeks review of an order denying his motion for extension of time to move for rehearing. Although the defendant stated good cause for an extension of time, we affirm because he was not entitled to relief under rule 3.801 as.a matter of law. Our affirmance is without prejudice for him to file a timely rule 3.850 motion'if he can state a sufficient claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, GROSS and MAY, JJ., • concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 So. 3d 467, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 726, 2016 WL 231498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-j-clark-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.