Matthew Hamann v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Matthew Hamann v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 1053
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 12, 2013·No. 01-12-00591-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE OF ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-12-00591-CR Style: Matthew Hamann v The State of Texas * Date motion filed : February 13, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to Supplement Appellate Record Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:

If motion to extend time: Deadline to file document: Number of previous extensions granted: Length of extension sought:

Ordered that motion is:

Appellant’s motion to supplement the record with the unofficial copy of the trial court’s charge from the Harris County District Clerk’s website is DENIED. If appellant wishes to supplement the record because a requested item has been omitted, appellant should send a letter to the district clerk and request that the district clerk prepare, certify, and file with this Court a supplemental record containing the omitted item. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c).

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ______________________________.

Date: March 12, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matthew Hamann v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Matthew Hamann v. State (Matthew Hamann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.