MATTHEW G. KENNEDY, ADMINISTRATOR AD LITEM OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS R. KENNEDY vs KATHLEEN S. KENNEDY

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 9, 2022·No. 21-1987·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MATTHEW G. KENNEDY, ADMINISTRATOR AD LITEM OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS R. KENNEDY,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D21-1987 LT Case No. 2020-CA-208

KATHLEEN S. KENNEDY,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 9, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County, Don Barbee, Jr., Judge.

Jeffrey A. Eisel, of Baskin Eisel Rightmyer, Clearwater, for Appellant.

Clifford A. Taylor, of The Hogan Law Firm, Brooksville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Estate of Kester v. Rocco, 117 So. 3d 1196, 1200

(Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“Where communications and assistance are consistent

with a ‘dutiful’ adult child towards an aging parent, there is no presumption of

undue influence.”).

EVANDER, COHEN and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATTHEW G. KENNEDY, ADMINISTRATOR AD LITEM OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS R. KENNEDY vs KATHLEEN S. KENNEDY, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

MATTHEW G. KENNEDY, ADMINISTRATOR AD LITEM OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS R. KENNEDY vs KATHLEEN S. KENNEDY (MATTHEW G. KENNEDY, ADMINISTRATOR AD LITEM OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS R. KENNEDY vs KATHLEEN S. KENNEDY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Kester v. Rocco
117 So. 3d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)