Matthew Eugene Devine v. Vicki Dianne Devine
This text of Matthew Eugene Devine v. Vicki Dianne Devine (Matthew Eugene Devine v. Vicki Dianne Devine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 07-15-00126-cv SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 4/13/2015 1:44:02 PM Vivian Long, Clerk
MARY H. SMITH TELEPHONE: 817.878.9388 mary.smith@kellyhart.com FAX: 817.878.9788
FILED IN April 13, 2015 7th COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 4/13/2015 1:44:02 PM Via Electronic Filing: VIVIAN LONG CLERK Ms. Vivian Long Clerk, Seventh Court of Appeals P.O. Box 9540 Amarillo, Texas 79105
Re: No. 07-15-00126-CV; Matthew Eugene Devine v. Vicki Dianne Devine
Dear Ms. Long:
Enclosed please find the Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion to Set Amount and Type of Security for Supersedeas as referenced in Appellant’s Emergency Motion for Review of Trial Court Ruling Pursuant to Rule 24.4 filed on April 9, 2015 in the above-referenced matter.
Thank you for your attention in this matter. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Mary H. Smith
Mary H. Smith
MHS/srb Enclosure:
cc: James V. Jay, IV jimj@lawgjm.com Thomas M. Michel thomasm@lawgjm.com Robley E. Sicard robleys@lawgjm.com Counsel for Appellee FORT WORTH OFFICE | 201 MAIN STREET, SUITE 2500 | FORT WORTH, TX 76102 | TELEPHONE: (817) 332-2500 | FAX: (817) 878-9280 AUSTIN OFFICE | 301 CONGRESS, SUITE 2000 | AUSTIN, TX 78701 | TELEPHONE: (512) 495-6400 | FAX: (512) 495-6401 MIDLAND OFFICE | 508 W. WALL, SUITE 444 | MIDLAND, TX 79701 | TELEPHONE: (432) 683-4691 | FAX: (432) 683-6518 NEW ORLEANS OFFICE | 400 POYDRAS STREET, SUITE 1812 | NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 | TELEPHONE: (504) 522-1812 | FAX: (504) 522-1813 Kelly Hart & Hallman, a Limited Liability Partnership | www.kellyhart.com 324-552104-14
CAUSE NO. 324-552104-14
MATTHEW EUGENE DEVINE § IN THE DISTRICT COURT § V. § 324TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT § VICKI DIANNE DEVINE § TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO SET AMOUNT AND TYPE OF SECURITY FOR SUPERSEDEAS
On March 26, 2015, came on for consideration Petitioner's Motion to Set Amount
and Type of Security for Supersedeas. The Court, having considered the motion, the
response, and the argument of counsel, is of the opinion that the motion should be and is
hereby DENIED.
IT IS THEREFORE ordered that Petitioner's Motion to Set Amount and Type of
Security for Supersedeas is hereby DENIED.
SIGNED this ^7 day of 4-2 ,2015.
t JUDGKPRESIDING
O R D E R DENYING P E T I T I O N E R ' S M O T I O N T O SET A M O U N T AND T Y P E O F S E C U R I T Y F O R S U P E R S E D E A S Page I
COURT'S MINUTES TRANSACTION# SCfG
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Matthew Eugene Devine v. Vicki Dianne Devine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-eugene-devine-v-vicki-dianne-devine-texcrimapp-2015.