Matthew Doyle and Charlene Doyle v. Viridian Municipal Management District

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 17, 2025·No. 13-25-00085-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-25-00085-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

MATTHEW DOYLE AND CHARLENE DOYLE, Appellants,

v.

VIRIDIAN MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Appellee.

ON APPEAL FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Cron Memorandum Opinion by Justice West

This matter is before the Court on an unopposed motion to dismiss appeal. 1 On

February 18, 2025, we ordered this case abated and referred the matter to mediation.

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Second Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket

equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. The parties have finalized a settlement, and appellants request that the Court dismiss the

appeal.

Upon review of the unopposed motion, the Court is of the opinion that the

unopposed motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, this case

is reinstated, the unopposed motion is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. The

costs are taxed against the appellants. See id. R. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the

parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at

appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

JON WEST Justice

Delivered and filed on the 17th day of April, 2025.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matthew Doyle and Charlene Doyle v. Viridian Municipal Management District, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Matthew Doyle and Charlene Doyle v. Viridian Municipal Management District (Matthew Doyle and Charlene Doyle v. Viridian Municipal Management District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.