Matthew Donald Shields v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Matthew Donald Shields v. State

DecidedJanuary 28, 2020

DocketA20A0779

StatusPublished

This text of Matthew Donald Shields v. State (Matthew Donald Shields v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matthew Donald Shields v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 09, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0779. MATTHEW DONALD SHIELDS v. THE STATE.

Matthew Donald Shields pled guilty to enticing a child for indent purposes and incest. Following the revocation of his probation in September 2016, Shields filed a motion to modify his probated sentence. The trial court denied the motion, and Shields filed a motion for reconsideration. The trial court denied the motion for reconsideration, and Shields filed this direct appeal.1 We lack jurisdiction. “In determining the proper procedure to follow in pursuing an appeal, the underlying subject matter generally controls over the relief sought.” Self v. Bayneum, 265 Ga. 14, 14-15 (453 SE2d 27) (1995). Because the underlying subject matter of this appeal is the revocation of Shields’s probation, compliance with the discretionary application procedures is required. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (5), (b); Todd v. State, 236 Ga. App. 757, 758 (513 SE2d 287) (1999); White v. State, 233 Ga. App. 873, 874 (505 SE2d 228) (1998). Furthermore, an order denying a motion for reconsideration is not appealable in its own right. Savage v. Newsome, 173 Ga. App. 271 (326 SE2d 5) (1985); see also Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 511 (536 SE2d 187) (2000). Nor did the motion for reconsideration extend the time for filing a challenge to the 2016 revocation order. See Bell v. Cohran, supra.

1 Shields appealed to the Supreme Court, which transferred the case to this Court. See Case No. S20A0172, transferred Sept. 25, 2019. For these reasons, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/09/2020 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 09, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0779. MATTHEW DONALD SHIELDS v. THE STATE.

Matthew Donald Shields pled guilty to enticing a child for indent purposes and incest. Following the revocation of his probation in September 2016, Shields filed a motion to modify his probated sentence. The trial court denied the motion, and Shields filed a motion for reconsideration. The trial court denied the motion for reconsideration, and Shields filed this direct appeal.1 We lack jurisdiction. “In determining the proper procedure to follow in pursuing an appeal, the underlying subject matter generally controls over the relief sought.” Self v. Bayneum, 265 Ga. 14, 14-15 (453 SE2d 27) (1995). Because the underlying subject matter of this appeal is the revocation of Shields’s probation, compliance with the discretionary application procedures is required. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (5), (b); Todd v. State, 236 Ga. App. 757, 758 (513 SE2d 287) (1999); White v. State, 233 Ga. App. 873, 874 (505 SE2d 228) (1998). Furthermore, an order denying a motion for reconsideration is not appealable in its own right. Savage v. Newsome, 173 Ga. App. 271 (326 SE2d 5) (1985); see also Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 511 (536 SE2d 187) (2000). Nor did the motion for reconsideration extend the time for filing a challenge to the 2016 revocation order. See Bell v. Cohran, supra.

1 Shields appealed to the Supreme Court, which transferred the case to this Court. See Case No. S20A0172, transferred Sept. 25, 2019. For these reasons, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/09/2020 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Matthew Donald Shields v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-donald-shields-v-state-gactapp-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack