Matthew Christensen v. Mark a Pleatman Md
This text of Matthew Christensen v. Mark a Pleatman Md (Matthew Christensen v. Mark a Pleatman Md) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
October 22, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
150231 & (10)(11)(12) Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, MATTHEW CHRISTENSEN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,
v SC: 150231 COA: 323404 Oakland CC: 2013-131850-NH MARK A. PLEATMAN, M.D., Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the October 3, 2014 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to waive stay request and transcript requirement is GRANTED. The motion for stay is DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 22, 2014 p1021 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Matthew Christensen v. Mark a Pleatman Md, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-christensen-v-mark-a-pleatman-md-mich-2014.