Matthew Cate v. United States District Court San Jose

Ninth Circuit

Matthew Cate v. United States District Court San Jose

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 29, 2010

Docket10-72977

StatusPublished

This text of Matthew Cate v. United States District Court San Jose (Matthew Cate v. United States District Court San Jose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matthew Cate v. United States District Court San Jose, (9th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MATTHEW CATE,  Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT  COURT FOR THE NORTHERN No. 10-72977 DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE, ORDER Respondent, MICHAEL ANGELO MORALES and ALBERT GREENWOOD BROWN, Real Parties in Interest.  Filed September 29, 2010

Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, M. Margaret McKeown, and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The State’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Petition for Writ of Mandamus is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MATTHEW CATE,  Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT  COURT FOR THE NORTHERN No. 10-72977 DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE, ORDER Respondent, MICHAEL ANGELO MORALES and ALBERT GREENWOOD BROWN, Real Parties in Interest.  Filed September 29, 2010

Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, M. Margaret McKeown, and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The State’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Petition for Writ of Mandamus is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Matthew Cate v. United States District Court San Jose, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-cate-v-united-states-district-court-san-jo-ca9-2010.