Matthew Castle v. Panhandle Plains Development, LLC
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00406-CV
MATTHEW CASTLE, APPELLANT
V.
PANHANDLE PLAINS DEVELOPMENT, LLC, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Randall County, Texas Trial Court No. 85574L2, Honorable Matthew C. Martindale, Presiding
May 6, 2025 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Matthew Castle, proceeding pro se, appeals from the trial court’s Final
Judgment. Appellant’s brief was due April 7, 2025, but was not filed. By letter of April 14,
2025, we notified Appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of
prosecution, without further notice, if a brief was not received by April 24. To date,
Appellant has neither filed a brief nor had any further communication with this Court. Accordingly, we dismiss his appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matthew Castle v. Panhandle Plains Development, LLC (Matthew Castle v. Panhandle Plains Development, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.