Matthew Canipe v. Krystal Barrett

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 7, 2016
Docket14-3589
StatusPublished

This text of Matthew Canipe v. Krystal Barrett (Matthew Canipe v. Krystal Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthew Canipe v. Krystal Barrett, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

MATTHEW CANIPE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-3589

KRYSTAL BARRETT,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 3, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County. Christopher N. Patterson, Judge.

Matthew Canipe, pro se, Appellant.

Michelle Blankenship Jordan of Jordan Peskin, P.A., Chipley, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Matthew Canipe v. Krystal Barrett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-canipe-v-krystal-barrett-fladistctapp-2016.