Matthew C. Cunningham v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Matthew C. Cunningham v. United States

391 F.2d 457, 129 U.S. App. D.C. 104, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5883

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 23, 1967

Docket19648_1

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 391 F.2d 457 (Matthew C. Cunningham v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matthew C. Cunningham v. United States, 391 F.2d 457, 129 U.S. App. D.C. 104, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5883 (D.C. Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

After having been found not guilty of felony murder as charged in the first count of an indictment and not guilty of premeditated murder as charged in the second count, this appellant was found guilty by the jury of second degree murder under the second count of the indictment and guilty of robbery, as charged in the third count; this appeal followed

and this court having considered the several contentions here advanced on brief and at oral argument and being satisfied that there was no error with respect thereto in all aspects except with reference to the appellant’s claimed right to have counsel present at a line-up identification ; and this court having deferred final disposition of the case pending decision by the Supreme Court of the cases of United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 and Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199; and the Supreme Court by its decisions in such cases on June 12, 1967 having resolved the issues there presented and having held that the rules therein laid down should not be made retroactive;

Now, upon consideration of the foregoing and on the record of the District Court no error having appeared,

It is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

After having been found not guilty of felony murder as charged in the first count of an indictment and not guilty of premeditated murder as charged in the second count, this appellant was found guilty by the jury of second degree murder under the second count of the indictment and guilty of robbery, as charged in the third count; this appeal followed

and this court having considered the several contentions here advanced on brief and at oral argument and being satisfied that there was no error with respect thereto in all aspects except with reference to the appellant’s claimed right to have counsel present at a line-up identification ; and this court having deferred final disposition of the case pending decision by the Supreme Court of the cases of United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 and Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199; and the Supreme Court by its decisions in such cases on June 12, 1967 having resolved the issues there presented and having held that the rules therein laid down should not be made retroactive;

Now, upon consideration of the foregoing and on the record of the District Court no error having appeared,

It is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

391 F.2d 457, 129 U.S. App. D.C. 104, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-c-cunningham-v-united-states-cadc-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack