Matthew Brach v. Gavin Newsom

18 F.4th 1031
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 8, 2021·No. 20-56291·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 8 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MATTHEW BRACH, an individual; JESSE No. 20-56291 PETRILLA, an individual; LACEE BEAULIEU, an individual; ERICA D.C. No. SEPHTON, an individual; KENNETH 2:20-cv-06472-SVW-AFM FLEMING, an individual; JOHN ZIEGLER, Central District of California, an individual; ALISON WALSH, an Los Angeles individual; ROGER HACKETT, an individual; CHRISTINE RUIZ, an ORDER individual; Z. R., a minor; ADE ONIBOKUN, an individual; BRIAN HAWKINS, an individual; TIFFANY MITROWKE, an individual; MARIANNA BEMA; ASHLEY RAMIREZ, an individual,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as the Governor of California; ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California; TOMAS ARAGON, in his official capacity as the State Public Health Officer and Department of Public Health Director; TONY THURMOND, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction and Director of Education,

Defendants-Appellees.

.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matthew Brach v. Gavin Newsom, 18 F.4th 1031 (9th Cir. 2021).

18 F.4th 1031 (Matthew Brach v. Gavin Newsom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matthew Brach v. Gavin Newsom
38 F.4th 6 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)
Calvary Chapel San Jose v. Cody
N.D. California, 2022
United States v. Jeffrey Olsen
21 F.4th 1036 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)