Matthew Bondie v. Cynthia Rubert Md
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
October 19, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly 143215 Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly MATTHEW BONDIE, Brian K. Zahra, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 143215 COA: 295832 Ogemaw CC: 06-656083-NH CYNTHIA RUBERT, M.D., CYNTHIA RUBERT, M.D., P.C., and WEST BRANCH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 3, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH, MARILYN KELLY, and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal to consider the expert testimony issue and the constitutionality of MCL 600.2169.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 19, 2011 _________________________________________ d1012 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matthew Bondie v. Cynthia Rubert Md (Matthew Bondie v. Cynthia Rubert Md) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.