Matthew Bender & Co. v. Shore

86 A.D.2d 708, 447 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15260
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 14, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 86 A.D.2d 708 (Matthew Bender & Co. v. Shore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthew Bender & Co. v. Shore, 86 A.D.2d 708, 447 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15260 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Kahn, J.), entered January 22,1981 in Albany County, which denied defendant’s motion to change venue. Plaintiff sued defendant, an attorney, in Albany County for moneys owed for the purchase of lawbooks. Plaintiff’s principal place of business is located in Albany County. Defendant moved for a change of venue from Albany County to New York County contending that Albany County is not a proper county to pursue the action and the convenience of witnesses would be best served by locating the trial in New York County. Defendant contends that the action arose out of a consumer credit transaction and, as such, pursuant to CPLR 503 (subd [f]), it should be tried in the county of defendant’s residence. The motion was properly denied by Special Term. CPLR 105 (subd [f]) specifically defines a “consumer credit transaction” as follows: “The term ‘consumer credit transaction’ means a transaction wherein credit is extended to an individual and the money, property, or service which is the subject of the transaction is primarily for personal, family or household purposes.” The purchase of lawbooks for the use of an attorney in his professional endeavors does not fall within the scope of a consumer credit transaction. The affidavit of defendant fails to otherwise justify a change of venue. Pursuant to the provisions of CPLR 503 (subd [c]), plaintiff has properly designated Albany County as the place of trial since its principal office is located there. Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citibank, N.A. v. Friedman
E.D. New York, 2024
Hacker v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.
131 Misc. 2d 757 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1986)
State v. Cohen
123 Misc. 2d 51 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 A.D.2d 708, 447 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-bender-co-v-shore-nyappdiv-1982.