Matthew Bauman v. Aldridge Electric, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 7, 2015
Docket07-15-00415-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Matthew Bauman v. Aldridge Electric, Inc. (Matthew Bauman v. Aldridge Electric, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthew Bauman v. Aldridge Electric, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________

No. 07-15-00415-CV ________________________

MATTHEW BAUMAN, APPELLANT

V.

ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC., APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 223rd District Court Gray County, Texas Trial Court No. 37,512; Honorable Phil N. Vanderpool, Presiding

December 7, 2015

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellant, Matthew Bauman, gave notice of appeal from the trial court’s

summary judgment in favor of Appellee, Aldridge Electric, Inc. By letter dated

November 4, 2015, the clerk of this court advised Bauman that a filing fee of $205 was

overdue and notified him that failure to submit payment within ten days would subject

the appeal to dismissal pursuant to Rule 42.3(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. Bauman has not responded, paid the filing fee, nor made other arrangements for

the discharge of the filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b). Unless a party is excused

from paying a filing fee, the clerk of this court is required to collect filing fees set by

statute or the Texas Supreme Court when an item is presented for filing. See id. at 5,

12.1(b). Although the filing of a proper notice of appeal invokes an appellate court’s

jurisdiction, if a party fails to follow the prescribed rules of appellate procedure, the

appeal may be dismissed. Id. at 25.1(b).

Accordingly, having provided Bauman a reasonable opportunity to cure this

defect, this appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate

rules and failure to comply with a notice from the clerk requiring action within a specified

time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Matthew Bauman v. Aldridge Electric, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-bauman-v-aldridge-electric-inc-texapp-2015.