Mattete v. Gonzales
This text of Mattete v. Gonzales (Mattete v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1349
PATRICK MATTETE,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A96-451-506)
Submitted: August 17, 2005 Decided: August 30, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Mattete, Petitioner Pro Se. Carol Federighi, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Patrick Mattete, a native and citizen of Tanzania,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s order denying his
applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection
under the Convention Against Torture. Mattete disputes the finding
that he failed to meet his burden of proof to qualify for
withholding of removal. We have reviewed the record and conclude
that substantial evidence supports the finding that Mattete failed
to demonstrate eligibility for this relief. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1208.16(b) (2005).
We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mattete v. Gonzales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mattete-v-gonzales-ca4-2005.