Matteson v. Logan
This text of 5 R.I. Dec. 107 (Matteson v. Logan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After verdict for plaintiff, heard on defendant’s motion for a new trial based upon the usual grounds, the ground of newly discovered evidence not being pressed.
This action was based upon a claim for labor and materials furnished by plaintiff for defendant in repairing and rendering more efficient the 'heating plants on Westminster street and on Elmwood avenue.
The plaintiff presents a case- upon which the jury had the right, if they believed his testimony, to return a verdict in his favor. The plaintiff’s testimony was contradicted by defendant but apparently the jury believed plaintiff and rendered a verdict in his favor in the sum of $369.76.
During the progress of the trial it appeared, by the weight of the evidence that a radiator furnished by plaintiff in his bill of particulars at $16.46 was about $5.00 in excess of a fair' price for the same. With the exception of the $5.00 above referred to, the verdict is fully sustained by the evidence and the weight thereof.
If plaintiff files a remittitur for the above sum of $5.00 on or before April 20, 1929, motion for a new trial is denied, otherwise same is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 R.I. Dec. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matteson-v-logan-risuperct-1929.