Matteson v. Harry M. Forst & Royalty Securities Corp.
This text of 230 A.D. 732 (Matteson v. Harry M. Forst & Royalty Securities Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to vacate judgment and amended judgment as to appealing defendants - reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. There is no proof that defendant Forst consented to waive notice of trial. Lazansky, P. J., Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Young and Kapper, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D. 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matteson-v-harry-m-forst-royalty-securities-corp-nyappdiv-1930.