Matteson v. County of Herkimer

94 A.D.2d 950, 464 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18425
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 25, 1983·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

. Application unanimously denied and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: We agree with respondent that the proposed taking is de minimis (EDPL 206, subd [D]). The county plans to straighten and flatten a strip of road less than one-half mile long. The total taking involves only 1.94 acres of petitioners’ 79.5 acres of land. The land to be taken includes only narrow strips abutting the present roadway, as well as one small triangular piece which is a rock outcropping. The taking will not interfere with current land use and does not require the removal of any structures. Under all the circumstances presented, we confirm the condemnor’s finding that it is exempt from the public hearing requirement. (EDPL 207.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matteson v. County of Herkimer, 94 A.D.2d 950, 464 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

94 A.D.2d 950 (Matteson v. County of Herkimer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eagle Creek Land Resources, LLC v. Woodstone Lake Development, LLC
108 A.D.3d 71 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Zutt v. State
99 A.D.3d 85 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Rockland County Sewer District No. 1 v. J. & J. Dodge, Inc.
209 A.D.2d 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)