Matteson v. City of Eustis

Supreme Court of Florida

Matteson v. City of Eustis

184 So. 15, 134 Fla. 455, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1128

DecidedOctober 24, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 184 So. 15 (Matteson v. City of Eustis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matteson v. City of Eustis, 184 So. 15, 134 Fla. 455, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1128 (Fla. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari directed to the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and. for Lake County commanding *456 that he “under the Seal of your said Court, the record and proceedings in a certain cause lately pending in your said Court, wherein F. W. Mattes'on was Plaintiff in Error and City of Eustis, Florida, was Defendant in Error, with all things touching the same as fully and wholly as the same are before you now residing, to the Justices of our Supreme Court sitting in Term at Tallahassee, Florida, on the 29th day of June, A. D. 1937, to send and certify, enclosed together with this writ.”

The Clerk to whom the Writ was' directed has not complied with Lhe command of the Writ and, although the cause has been submitted on brief, there is no record before us upon which we can base any judgment.

It is the duty of Petitioner to follow up the Writ and to take steps as may be needful to accomplish the commands thereof. This he shall do within twenty days from the ■ entry of this order, and in default thereof the cause shall stand dismissed.

So ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari directed to the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and. for Lake County commanding *456 that he “under the Seal of your said Court, the record and proceedings in a certain cause lately pending in your said Court, wherein F. W. Mattes'on was Plaintiff in Error and City of Eustis, Florida, was Defendant in Error, with all things touching the same as fully and wholly as the same are before you now residing, to the Justices of our Supreme Court sitting in Term at Tallahassee, Florida, on the 29th day of June, A. D. 1937, to send and certify, enclosed together with this writ.”

The Clerk to whom the Writ was' directed has not complied with Lhe command of the Writ and, although the cause has been submitted on brief, there is no record before us upon which we can base any judgment.

It is the duty of Petitioner to follow up the Writ and to take steps as may be needful to accomplish the commands thereof. This he shall do within twenty days from the ■ entry of this order, and in default thereof the cause shall stand dismissed.

So ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 So. 15, 134 Fla. 455, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matteson-v-city-of-eustis-fla-1938.