Matteson v. City of Eustis

184 So. 15, 134 Fla. 455, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1128
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Matteson v. City of Eustis. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 Fla. 591
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 24, 1938·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari directed to the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and. for Lake County commanding *456 that he “under the Seal of your said Court, the record and proceedings in a certain cause lately pending in your said Court, wherein F. W. Mattes'on was Plaintiff in Error and City of Eustis, Florida, was Defendant in Error, with all things touching the same as fully and wholly as the same are before you now residing, to the Justices of our Supreme Court sitting in Term at Tallahassee, Florida, on the 29th day of June, A. D. 1937, to send and certify, enclosed together with this writ.”

The Clerk to whom the Writ was' directed has not complied with Lhe command of the Writ and, although the cause has been submitted on brief, there is no record before us upon which we can base any judgment.

It is the duty of Petitioner to follow up the Writ and to take steps as may be needful to accomplish the commands thereof. This he shall do within twenty days from the ■ entry of this order, and in default thereof the cause shall stand dismissed.

So ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matteson v. City of Eustis, 184 So. 15, 134 Fla. 455, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1128 (Fla. 1938).

184 So. 15 (Matteson v. City of Eustis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.