Matteson v. Arata

171 So. 2d 114, 277 Ala. 405, 1965 Ala. LEXIS 526
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 21, 1965
Docket1 Div. 224
StatusPublished

This text of 171 So. 2d 114 (Matteson v. Arata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matteson v. Arata, 171 So. 2d 114, 277 Ala. 405, 1965 Ala. LEXIS 526 (Ala. 1965).

Opinion

SIMPSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court, in Equity, of Mobile County, discharging an injunction theretofore issued and dismissing the bill of complaint.The complainant brings this appeal.

The appellant has failed to file any brief with the Clerk of this Court, required by Supreme Court Rule 12 and therefore, this Court is without authority to review the decision. Rule 12 also stipulates that “Upon failure to so file, the appeal shall be dismissed or the case affirmed”.

This rule has been consistently adhered to regardless of any extenuating circumstances. Ex parte Nettles, 276 Ala. 508, 164 So. 2d 504; Ex parte N. A. A. C. P. v. Jones, 268 Ala. 504, 109 So.2d 140; Phalen v. Fort, 266 Ala. 213, 95 So.2d 401.

Indeed, this Court is without authority to review such a decision or decree where no brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. Ala.Dig., Appeal and Error, ^773(2).

Appeal dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and MERRILL and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phalen v. Fort
95 So. 2d 401 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
Ex Parte National Ass'n for Advance. of Col. People
109 So. 2d 140 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)
Ex parte Nettles
164 So. 2d 504 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 So. 2d 114, 277 Ala. 405, 1965 Ala. LEXIS 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matteson-v-arata-ala-1965.