MatterofWynnvFischer
This text of MatterofWynnvFischer (MatterofWynnvFischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: September 11, 2014 517577 ________________________________
In the Matter of CHARLES L. WYNN SR., Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent. ________________________________
Calendar Date: August 4, 2014
Before: Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy, Rose and Clark, JJ.
__________
Charles L. Wynn Sr., Auburn, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a determination finding him guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. With respect to petitioner's request that he be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, "inmates have no -2- 517577
constitutional or statutory right to their prior housing or programming status" (Matter of Hamilton v Bezio, 93 AD3d 1049, 1050 [2012]; see Matter of Sykes v Fischer, 98 AD3d 769, 769 [2012]). Accordingly, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and this proceeding must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Toliver v Fischer, 114 AD3d 984, 984 [2014]).
Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy, Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
ENTER:
Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MatterofWynnvFischer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matterofwynnvfischer-nyappdiv-2014.