MatterofRamosvDepartmentofCorrectionsandCommunitySupervision

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 4, 2014
Docket519140
StatusPublished

This text of MatterofRamosvDepartmentofCorrectionsandCommunitySupervision (MatterofRamosvDepartmentofCorrectionsandCommunitySupervision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MatterofRamosvDepartmentofCorrectionsandCommunitySupervision, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: December 4, 2014 519140 ________________________________

In the Matter of DAVID RAMOS, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION et al., Respondents. ________________________________

Calendar Date: October 21, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., Stein, Rose, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ.

__________

David Ramos, Auburn, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding to challenge a prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of making a false statement, being out of place and a movement regulation violation. The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharge refunded to his inmate account. As petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of -2- 519140

Scott v Fischer, 119 AD3d 1307 [2014]).

Peters, P.J., Stein, Rose, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. Fischer
119 A.D.3d 1307 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MatterofRamosvDepartmentofCorrectionsandCommunitySupervision, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matteroframosvdepartmentofcorrectionsandcommunitys-nyappdiv-2014.