MatterofMendelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 23, 2014·No. D-71-14·Published

Opinion

State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: October 23, 2014 D-71-14

In the Matter of MICHAEL B.

MENDELSON, an Attorney.

COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STANDARDS, Petitioner;

MICHAEL B. MENDELSON, Respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 1558923)

Calendar Date: September 15, 2014

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Rose and Lynch, JJ.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael G. Gaynor of counsel), for petitioner.

Michael B. Mendelson, Delhi, respondent pro se.

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, First Department in 1972. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the Town of Delhi, Delaware County.

By decision dated July 13, 2004, this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, but stayed the suspension upon certain conditions (Matter of Mendelson, 9 AD3d 677 [2004]). By further decision dated December 20, 2007, we extended respondent's stayed suspension for a period of two years (Matter of Mendelson, 46 AD3d 1212 [2007]).

-2- D-71-14

Respondent applies to terminate his stayed suspension.

Because we conclude that respondent has complied with the terms and conditions of his stayed suspension, we grant the application.

Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Rose and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted, and the stayed suspension imposed by this Court's decisions dated July 13, 2004 and December 20, 2007 is terminated.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MatterofMendelson, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

MatterofMendelson (MatterofMendelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Mendelson
9 A.D.3d 677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re Mendelson
46 A.D.3d 1212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)