MatterofHayesvAnnucci

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 2014
Docket518710
StatusPublished

This text of MatterofHayesvAnnucci (MatterofHayesvAnnucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MatterofHayesvAnnucci, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: November 6, 2014 518710 ________________________________

In the Matter of SIDNEY HAYES, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent. ________________________________

Calendar Date: September 16, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy, Rose and Devine, JJ.

__________

Sidney Hayes, Gouverneur, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination, after a tier III disciplinary hearing, finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the possession of alcohol. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged, and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Although not mentioned in the letter from the Attorney General, we note that "any loss of good time incurred by petitioner as a result of the determination -2- 518710

should be restored" (Matter of Benitez v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1237, 1238 [2014] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). In view of this, and given that petitioner has otherwise received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see id.; Matter of Loper v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1234, 1234 [2014]).

Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy, Rose and Devine, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loper v. Fischer
118 A.D.3d 1234 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Benitez v. Fischer
118 A.D.3d 1237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MatterofHayesvAnnucci, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matterofhayesvannucci-nyappdiv-2014.