MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Stefandl]

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Stefandl]

120 A.D.3d 1482, 991 N.Y.S.2d 920, 2014 NY Slip Op 06142, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6108

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 11, 2014

DocketD-49-14

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 120 A.D.3d 1482 (MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Stefandl]) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Stefandl], 120 A.D.3d 1482, 991 N.Y.S.2d 920, 2014 NY Slip Op 06142, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

*1483 Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 2001, was suspended by this Court’s order dated January 30, 2014 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Peters, PJ., Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI