Mattern v. United States

66 Ct. Cl. 559, 1928 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 317, 1928 WL 2972
United States Court of Claims·Decided December 3, 1928·No. No. H-198·Published

Opinion

[560] MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT

This case is presented for formal judgment, there being no contention between the attorneys of the several parties to the action as to their rights.

The original dispute between the plaintiffs and the defendant was as to whether plaintiffs were entitled to recover the value of the property involved at the time it was taken, together with interest thereon from such time. Any question that may have at one time existed así'to the rule .which should be applied herein has now been settled in plaintiffs’ favor by the cases of Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. United States, 261 U. S. 299; Liggett & Myers v. United States, 274 U. S. 215; Phelps v. United States, 274 U. S. 341.

Judgment will be entered accordingly. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mattern v. United States, 66 Ct. Cl. 559, 1928 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 317, 1928 WL 2972 (cc 1928).

66 Ct. Cl. 559 (Mattern v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United States
261 U.S. 299 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. United States
274 U.S. 215 (Supreme Court, 1927)
Phelps v. United States
274 U.S. 341 (Supreme Court, 1927)