Matter of Zion Nazar H-S. (Shaniqua W.)

122 A.D.3d 486, 997 N.Y.S.2d 43
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 18, 2014
Docket13514
StatusPublished

This text of 122 A.D.3d 486 (Matter of Zion Nazar H-S. (Shaniqua W.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Zion Nazar H-S. (Shaniqua W.), 122 A.D.3d 486, 997 N.Y.S.2d 43 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Sarah E Cooper, J.), entered on or about December 18, 2013, which denied respondent mother’s motion to vacate an order of fact finding and disposition, same court and Judge, entered on or about July 12, *487 2013, determining that she permanently neglected the subject child, terminating her parental rights, and committing the custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent failed to provide either a reasonable excuse for her failure to appear at the fact-finding and dispositional hearings, or a meritorious defense to the permanent neglect petition (see CPLR 5015 [a]; Matter of Evan Matthew A. [Jocelyn Yvette A.], 91 AD3d 538 [1st Dept 2012]). Respondent’s documentation did not demonstrate that her appointment with the New York City Department of Homeless Services was scheduled in advance or that it could not have been rescheduled so that it did not occur on the same day as the hearing on the petition to terminate her parental rights. In any event, it did not excuse her from notifying her attorney or the court, especially since she knew of the date of the fact-finding hearing two months earlier (see Matter of Lisa Marie Ann L. [Melissa L.], 91 AD3d 524 [1st Dept 2012]). Further, the mother’s partial compliance with requisite services is insufficient to establish a meritorious defense to the petition (see Matter of Julian Michael G. [Jeannette G.], 94 AD3d 573 [1st Dept 2012]).

We have reviewed the mother’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Friedman, J.E, Acosta, Saxe, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Lisa Marie Ann L.
91 A.D.3d 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Evan Matthew A.
91 A.D.3d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Julian Michael G.
94 A.D.3d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 A.D.3d 486, 997 N.Y.S.2d 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-zion-nazar-h-s-shaniqua-w-nyappdiv-2014.