Matter of Zhane A.F. v. Catholic Guardian Socy. & Home Bur.

139 A.D.3d 458, 31 N.Y.S.3d 57
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 10, 2016
Docket1093A 1093
StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.3d 458 (Matter of Zhane A.F. v. Catholic Guardian Socy. & Home Bur.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Zhane A.F. v. Catholic Guardian Socy. & Home Bur., 139 A.D.3d 458, 31 N.Y.S.3d 57 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan K. Knipps, J.), entered on or about May 12, 2015, which, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant mother permanently neglected the subject children, terminated her parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of them to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record demonstrates the agency’s diligent efforts, including formulating a service plan, meeting with the mother to discuss the plan, making referrals for services, and monitoring her compliance.

The findings of permanent neglect are supported by clear and convincing evidence, including the testimony of the case worker, and the agency’s progress notes. The mother failed to visit the children for a seven-month time period and was noncompliant with services, including mental health treatment.

The court properly found that a preponderance of the evidence supported termination of the mother’s parental rights based on her failure to complete the service plan and lack of insight into her mental health issues after three years. The court correctly rejected a suspended judgment because the mother had not made significant progress in overcoming the problems that led to placement and the children needed stability, which they obtained in the foster home, where they were thriving (see Matter of Charles Jahmel M. [Charles E.M.], 124 AD3d 496, 497 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 905 [2015]).

We have considered the mother’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.R, Renwick, Saxe, Gische and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Charles Jahmel M. (Charles E. M.)
124 A.D.3d 496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A.D.3d 458, 31 N.Y.S.3d 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-zhane-af-v-catholic-guardian-socy-home-bur-nyappdiv-2016.