Matter of Zaid v. Zaid

204 A.D.3d 931, 164 N.Y.S.3d 859, 2022 NY Slip Op 02555
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 20, 2022·No. Docket No. F-5900-17·Published

Opinion

Matter of Zaid v Zaid (2022 NY Slip Op 02555)
Matter of Zaid v Zaid
2022 NY Slip Op 02555
Decided on April 20, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 20, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
PAUL WOOTEN
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.

2021-05930
(Docket No. F-5900-17)

[*1]In the Matter of Fareed Zaid, petitioner-respondent,

v

Christine Zaid, respondent; Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Child Support Enforcement Bureau, nonparty- appellant.


Dennis M. Cohen, Central Islip, NY (Jennifer L. Basile of counsel), for nonparty-appellant.

Law Offices of Michael J. Langer, P.C., Mineola, NY, for petitioner-respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, nonparty Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Child Support Enforcement Bureau, appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Paul M. Hensley, J.), dated July 29, 2021. The order directed nonparty Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Child Support Enforcement Bureau, to suspend enforcement of a child support order of the same court (Darlene Jorif-Mangane, S.M.) dated December 4, 2017.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order directing the Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Child Support Enforcement Bureau, to suspend enforcement of a prior support order must be dismissed, as no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, and under the circumstances of this case, we decline to grant leave to appeal (see Family Ct Act § 1112[a]; Matter of Shu Jiao Zhao v Wei Rong, 183 AD3d 898).

BARROS, J.P., MALTESE, WOOTEN and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Zaid v. Zaid, 204 A.D.3d 931, 164 N.Y.S.3d 859, 2022 NY Slip Op 02555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

204 A.D.3d 931 (Matter of Zaid v. Zaid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Thomas v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys.
2020 NY Slip Op 3016 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)