Matter of Zabar

2026 NY Slip Op 30920(U)
CourtSurrogate's Court, New York County
DecidedMarch 6, 2026
DocketFile No. 2025-4634
StatusUnpublished
AuthorHilary Gingold

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 30920(U) (Matter of Zabar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Surrogate's Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Zabar, 2026 NY Slip Op 30920(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2026).

Opinion

Matter of Zabar 2026 NY Slip Op 30920(U) March 6, 2026 Surrogate's Court, New York County Docket Number: File No. 2025-4634 Judge: Hilary Gingold Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUR.2025-4634.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX502_TO.html[03/19/2026 3:45:59 PM] ENTERED SURROGATE'S COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK MAR 't4f 2026 COUNTY OF NEW YORK N DA~ ENTRY DEPT ------------------------------------------------------------------x ew York County Surrogate's Court Probate Proceeding, Will of File No.: 2025-4634 SAULZABAR,

Deceased.

-------------------------------------------------------------------x

GINGOL D, S.

In this uncontested probate proceeding, petitioner Carole Zabar ("Petitioner") seeks to

probate a purported copy of a last will and testament of Saul Zabar ("Decedent"), dated January

13, 1979 ("will copy"), and a purported copy of the first codicil to the last will and testament of

the Decedent, dated March 20, 1979 ("codicil copy") as Petitioner alleges the original last will and

testament dated, dated January 13, 1979 ("original will") and the original of the first codicil to last

will and testament of Decedent, dated March 20, 1979 ("original codicil") were lost.

Decedent passed away on October 7, 2025, survived by his spouse, Petitioner, and his three

children. All of Decedent's children waived and consented to probate of the will copy and codicil

copy. The will copy and codicil copy leaves all of Decedent's tangible personal property and

Decedent's residuary estate to Petitioner outright.

The will copy contains an attestation clause, but does not contain an Affidavit of Attesting

Witnesses required by SCPA § 1406.

Pursuant to SCPA § 1405, the attorney draftsperson's wife, Judith Halperin ("Ms.

Halperin") submitted (1) an application to dispense with testimony of the attorney draftsperson as

a witness of the original will and original codicil due to the attorney draftsperson's death and (2)

an application to dispense with testimony of another witness, Joan Blair Stevens ("Ms. Stevens"),

of the original will and original codicil due to Ms. Stevens' death.

[* 1] Ms. Halperin also submitted an affidavit as an attesting witness to the original will. In her

affidavit, she attested ( 1) that the requirements were met for execution of a will pursuant to EPTL §

3-2.1, (2) that the will copy reflects the original will she witnessed in 1979, and (3) it was the

attorney draftsperson's "practice to make a conformed copy of a will after a client signed his or

her will".

Lewis C. Taishoff, an attorney acquainted with the deceased attorney-draftsperson, also

submitted an affidavit as an attesting witness to the original codicil. In his affidavit, he supported

that the requirements were met for execution of a will pursuant to EPTL § 3-2.1 and he attested

that the codicil copy reflects the original codicil he witnessed in 1979.

Eric B. Woldenberg ("Mr. Woldenberg"), the attorney for Petitioner in this probate

proceeding, also submitted an affirmation in support of the will copy. He stated that he met with

Decedent in 2011 about Decedent's estate plan and the original will provided by Decedent then

reflected the will copy presented in this proceeding. He stated that he discussed with Decedent that

Decedent's will and codicil leaves everything to Petitioner outright due to the unlimited marital

deduction and that Decedent never pursued any updates on his original will and original codicil

following Mr. Woldenberg and Decedent's 2011 meeting.

A lost or destroyed will may be admitted to probate if (1) it is shown that the will has not

been revoked, (2) execution of the will is proved in the manner required for probate of an existing

will, and (3) "[a]ll of the provisions of the will are clearly and distinctly proved by each of at least

two credible witnesses or by a copy or draft of the will proved to be true and complete" (See Matter

of DiSiena, 103 AD3d 1077, 1078; Matter of Castiglione, 40 AD3d 1227, 1229, 837 N.Y.S.2d

360). "When a will, although once possessed by a testator, cannot be found after the death of the

testator, a strong presumption arises that the testator revoked the will by destruction" (Matter of

[* 2] Massimo, 177 AD3d 640, 641, 109 N.Y.S.3d 885; see Matter of Lewis, 25 NY3d 456, 462, 13

N.Y.S.3d 323, 34 N.E.3d 833; Matter of Marotta, 137 AD3d 787, 788, 26 N.Y.S.3d 348). "The

presumption may be overcome, and the lost will admitted to probate, if the proponent establishes

that the will was not revoked by the testator during his or her lifetime" (Matter of Massimo, 177

AD3d at 641; see Matter of Marotta, 137 AD3d at 788).

Here, in support of the petition, Petitioner submitted, among other things, (1) the attesting

witnesses' affidavits of the original will and original codicil, (2) proof of death for any remaining

witnesses of the original will and original codicil, (3) attorney affirmation that this will copy and

codicil copy reflected the Decedent's intent for his estate plan, and (4) that it was the attorney

draftsperson's practice to make a conformed copy of the original will and original codicil (see

SCPA § 1408; Matter ofTully, 227 AD2d 288,642 NYS2d 878 (1996]).

Therefore, the Court is satisfied that the original will and original codicil was validly

executed and that, at the time of execution, Decedent had the mental capacity to make a will and

was not under any restraint (EPTL § 3-2.l; SCPA § 1407(2], 1408). Finally, the provisions of the

lost will and lost codicil have been proven by the conformed copy of the executed will and

executed codicil, which were established as a true and complete copy (SCP A 1407(3 ]).

Decree signed incorporating the terms of the lost original will and lost original codicil.

Dated: March 6, 2026

[* 3]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of the Estate of Robyn R. Lewis
34 N.E.3d 833 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
Matter of Marotta
137 A.D.3d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
In re Estate of Castiglione
40 A.D.3d 1227 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re the Estate of Tully
227 A.D.2d 288 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 30920(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-zabar-nysurctnyc-2026.