Matter of Yin Z. (Hillside Hospital-Northwell Health)
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Matter of Yin Z. (Hillside Hospital-Northwell Health)
2026 NY Slip Op 04315
July 8, 2026
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
In the Matter of Yin Z. (Anonymous), appellant.
v
Hillside Hospital-Northwell Health, respondent.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Decided on July 8, 2026
2025-12220, (Index No. 501572/25)
Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P.
Barry E. Warhit
Laurence L. Love
Susan Quirk, JJ.
Mental Hygiene Legal Service, Garden City, NY (Eben Hill, Jill Krol, and Timothy Riselvato of counsel), for appellant.
Abrams Fensterman, LLP, Lake Success, NY (Sarah Chussler, Douglas K. Stern, and Lisa Colosi Florio of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.31 to compel the release of Yin Z. from a mental health care facility where she was being involuntarily confined and treated, Yin Z. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Andrea S. Ogle, J.), dated August 5, 2025. The order, after a hearing, denied Yin Z.'s application to compel her release.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
Yin Z. (hereinafter the patient) was admitted to Hillside Hospital-Northwell Health (hereinafter the hospital) on July 22, 2025, pursuant to certificates of two physicians who authorized her involuntary retention pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.27. On July 29, 2025, the patient made an application pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.31 for a hearing on the question of the need for involuntary care and treatment.
By order dated August 5, 2025, the Supreme Court, after a hearing, denied the patient's application pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.31 to compel the hospital to release her from involuntary confinement. The patient appeals.
As the patient concedes, this appeal has been rendered academic by the patient's discharge from the hospital (see Matter of Pavel V. [Coney Is. Hosp.], 207 AD3d 551, 551; Matter of G., Cynthia [Kings County Hosp.], 188 AD3d 881, 882). The patient contends, however, that this Court should apply the exception to the mootness doctrine to reach her unpreserved contention that she was deprived of a fair hearing by the Supreme Court's questioning of witnesses (see generally People v Yut Wai Tom, 53 NY2d 44, 58; People v Morales, 246 AD3d 941, 942).
The exception to the mootness doctrine permits an appellate court, in its discretion, to consider the merits of an academic appeal where "the controversy or issue involved is likely to recur, typically evades review, and raises a substantial and novel question" (Matter of Joshua J. [Tameka J.], 44 NY3d 394, 402 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Here, contrary to the patient's contention, this matter does not warrant the invocation of the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Jonathan S. [Creedmoor Psychiatric Ctr.], 238 AD3d 1155, 1156; Matter of Daniel C. [*2][South Beach Psychiatric Ctr.], 207 AD3d 539, 540).
CHAMBERS, J.P., WARHIT, LOVE and QUIRK, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Yin Z. (Hillside Hospital-Northwell Health) (Matter of Yin Z. (Hillside Hospital-Northwell Health)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.