Matter of Yilmaz v. Cachell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Yilmaz v. Cachell

127 A.D.3d 983, 4 N.Y.S.3d 917

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 2015

Docket2012-10440

StatusPublished

This text of 127 A.D.3d 983 (Matter of Yilmaz v. Cachell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Yilmaz v. Cachell, 127 A.D.3d 983, 4 N.Y.S.3d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Hope Schwartz Zimmerman, J.), dated September 13, 2012. The order, insofar as appealed from, awarded the father supervised visitation with the subject child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in directing that the father’s visitation with the subject child be *984 supervised. The determination has a sound basis in the record (see Matter of Morgan H. [Tamirra H.], 118 AD3d 997 [2014]).

The father’s contention that the Family Court erred in not conducting an in camera interview of the child is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit (see Matter of Rudy v Mazzetti, 5 AD3d 777 [2004]).

The father’s remaining contention is without merit.

Rivera, J.R, Austin, Sgroi and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI