Matter of Yacere D.
This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 03782 (Matter of Yacere D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Yacere D. |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 03782 |
| Decided on July 12, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on July 12, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.
2022-07685
(Docket No. D-4284-22)
Jordan M. Freundlich, Lake Success, NY, for appellant.
Raymond A. Tierney, District Attorney, Central Islip, NY (James G. Bernet of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, Yacere D. appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Fernando Camacho, J.), dated September 6, 2022. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that branch of Yacere D.'s motion which was to expunge all records relating to the testing of a sample of his DNA pursuant to Executive Law § 995-c(9)(b).
ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the notice of appeal is deemed to be an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see Family Ct Act § 1112[a]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
This proceeding arises out of a fatal collision on the Southern State Parkway in Suffolk County. The driver of the offending vehicle fled the scene. The appellant, who was 15 years old at the time of the collision, was arrested after a DNA report indicated that a sample of his DNA matched DNA recovered from the offending vehicle.
Following a fact-finding hearing, the Family Court found, inter alia, that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of manslaughter in the second degree, assault in the third degree, reckless endangerment in the second degree, and reckless driving, and adjudicated him a juvenile delinquent. Subsequently, the appellant moved, among other things, to expunge all records relating to the testing of his DNA sample pursuant to Executive Law § 995-c(9)(b). The appeal is from an order which denied that branch of the appellant's motion.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying that branch of his motion which was to expunge all records relating to the testing of his DNA sample pursuant to Executive Law § 995-c(9)(b) (cf. Matter of Francis O., 208 AD3d 51, 60-61; Matter of John R., 69 Misc 3d 493, 504-505 [Fam Ct, NY County]).
DILLON, J.P., IANNACCI, MALTESE and WAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2023 NY Slip Op 03782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-yacere-d-nyappdiv-2023.