Matter of Xiomary L.

2018 NY Slip Op 3429

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 3429 (Matter of Xiomary L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Xiomary L., 2018 NY Slip Op 3429 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Matter of Xiomary L. (2018 NY Slip Op 03429)
Matter of Xiomary L.
2018 NY Slip Op 03429
Decided on May 10, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 10, 2018
Richter, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Webber, Oing, Moulton, JJ.

6501

[*1]In re Xiomary L., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency


Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (John A. Newbery of counsel), for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elina Druker of counsel), for presentment agency.



Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about December 30, 2016, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that she committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, attempted assault in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed her with the Administration for Children's Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations regarding credibility and identification. The victim reliably identified appellant as one

of the attackers, and the record supports the court's rejection of appellant's testimony that she was merely an onlooker.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 10, 2018

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 3429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-xiomary-l-nyappdiv-2018.