MATTER OF WROBLEWSKI v. Ricotta
This text of 320 N.E.2d 647 (MATTER OF WROBLEWSKI v. Ricotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed (see Matter of Paciona v. Marshall, 35 N Y 2d 289). We would also note that the petitioner made a timely motion to dismiss the indictment allege ing illegality of the jury selection process. Appellate review of a denial of that motion, if available at all, would only be on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction if one ensued. (CPL 470.15, subd. 1; CPLR 7801, subd. 1; cf. People v. Chestnut, 26 N Y 2d 481.)
Chief Judge Bbeitel and Judges Jasen, Gabkielli, Jones, Wachtleb, Rabin and Stevens concur in Per Curiam opinion.
Judgment affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 N.E.2d 647, 35 N.Y.2d 745, 361 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-wroblewski-v-ricotta-ny-1974.