MATTER OF WROBLEWSKI v. Ricotta

320 N.E.2d 647, 35 N.Y.2d 745, 361 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1248
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 23, 1974·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*746 Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed (see Matter of Paciona v. Marshall, 35 N Y 2d 289). We would also note that the petitioner made a timely motion to dismiss the indictment allege ing illegality of the jury selection process. Appellate review of a denial of that motion, if available at all, would only be on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction if one ensued. (CPL 470.15, subd. 1; CPLR 7801, subd. 1; cf. People v. Chestnut, 26 N Y 2d 481.)

Chief Judge Bbeitel and Judges Jasen, Gabkielli, Jones, Wachtleb, Rabin and Stevens concur in Per Curiam opinion.

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATTER OF WROBLEWSKI v. Ricotta, 320 N.E.2d 647, 35 N.Y.2d 745, 361 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1248 (N.Y. 1974).

320 N.E.2d 647 (MATTER OF WROBLEWSKI v. Ricotta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rossettie ex rel. Young v. Finnerty
85 A.D.2d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Groh
57 A.D.2d 389 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Dondi v. Jones
351 N.E.2d 650 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Skibinski
85 Misc. 2d 908 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)