Matter of Woolridge
Opinion
In the matter of John Woolridge, Alleged to Be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
John WOOLRIDGE, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Keith W. Wingfield, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, for motion.
Before GRABER, P.J. Pro Tem., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.
On Respondent's Motion for Reconsideration May 18, 1990.
RIGGS, Judge.
We allow the state's motion for reconsideration of our opinion, 101 Or. App. 390, 790 P.2d 1192 (1990), to correct a misquotation from State v. Allmendinger, 36 Or. App. 381, 383, 584 P.2d 773 (1978) that appears at 101 Or. App. 390, 395, 790 P.2d 1192. What we intended to say is that mere threats of violence or verbal hostility may not be sufficient, standing alone, to show mental illness. We delete the sentence that followed the quotation in our former opinion.
Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
794 P.2d 1258 (Matter of Woolridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.