Matter of Woods v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Matter of Woods v. State

578 N.E.2d 715, 1991 Ind. App. LEXIS 1557, 1991 WL 191644

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 23, 1991

DocketNo. 45A03-9105-CR-133

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 578 N.E.2d 715 (Matter of Woods v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Woods v. State, 578 N.E.2d 715, 1991 Ind. App. LEXIS 1557, 1991 WL 191644 (Ind. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

HOFFMAN, Judge.

In July of 1984, appellant-defendant Johnny R. Woods was convicted of reckless homicide, a Class C felony, and sentenced to a 5-year term of imprisonment with 2 years suspended. Appellant was released on bond pending appeal. The conviction was affirmed in an unpublished opinion on June 6, 1985, and the decision was certified to the trial court on July 8, 1985. Due to a record-keeping error, appellant was not ordered to surrender to the trial court to begin serving his sentence until December 14, 1990. On January 18, 1991, appellant filed a motion for discharge which was denied after a hearing on February 1, 1991.

Appellant's sole claim on appeal is that the trial court erred in failing to discharge him after the 5¥/-year delay between the denial of his initial appeal and the order to surrender. He argues that public policy and justice require his discharge because he resided at the same address, remained steadily employed, and raised two children during the 5¥%-year period. However, the Indiana cases appellant cites in support of his position deal with delays in imposition rather than execution of sentences. Seq, e.g.. Taylor v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 398, 120 N.E.2d 165; Warner v. State (1924), 194 Ind. 426, 143 N.E. 233. As the State notes, our Supreme Court has long held that delay in committing a defendant does not invalidate the committal. Smith v. Howard (1934), 206 Ind. 496, 497, 190 N.E. 169, 170; see also Layne v. State (1977), 172 Ind.App. 570, 575, 361 N.E.2d 170, 173. The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for discharge.

Affirmed.

GARRARD and BARTEAU, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOFFMAN, Judge.

In July of 1984, appellant-defendant Johnny R. Woods was convicted of reckless homicide, a Class C felony, and sentenced to a 5-year term of imprisonment with 2 years suspended. Appellant was released on bond pending appeal. The conviction was affirmed in an unpublished opinion on June 6, 1985, and the decision was certified to the trial court on July 8, 1985. Due to a record-keeping error, appellant was not ordered to surrender to the trial court to begin serving his sentence until December 14, 1990. On January 18, 1991, appellant filed a motion for discharge which was denied after a hearing on February 1, 1991.

Appellant's sole claim on appeal is that the trial court erred in failing to discharge him after the 5¥/-year delay between the denial of his initial appeal and the order to surrender. He argues that public policy and justice require his discharge because he resided at the same address, remained steadily employed, and raised two children during the 5¥%-year period. However, the Indiana cases appellant cites in support of his position deal with delays in imposition rather than execution of sentences. Seq, e.g.. Taylor v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 398, 120 N.E.2d 165; Warner v. State (1924), 194 Ind. 426, 143 N.E. 233. As the State notes, our Supreme Court has long held that delay in committing a defendant does not invalidate the committal. Smith v. Howard (1934), 206 Ind. 496, 497, 190 N.E. 169, 170; see also Layne v. State (1977), 172 Ind.App. 570, 575, 361 N.E.2d 170, 173. The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for discharge.

Affirmed.

GARRARD and BARTEAU, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 N.E.2d 715, 1991 Ind. App. LEXIS 1557, 1991 WL 191644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-woods-v-state-indctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack