Matter of Woodcrest Fabrics, Inc. v. B & R Textile Corp.
462 N.E.2d 1199, 61 N.Y.2d 887, 474 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4140
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs (see Just In-Materials Designs v I.T.A.D. Assoc., 61 NY2d 882 [decided herewith]).
*889 Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Woodcrest Fabrics, Inc. v. B & R Textile Corp., 462 N.E.2d 1199, 61 N.Y.2d 887, 474 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4140 (N.Y. 1984).
462 N.E.2d 1199 (Matter of Woodcrest Fabrics, Inc. v. B & R Textile Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Deep v. Clinton Central School District
48 A.D.3d 1125 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
International Tin Council v. Amalgamet Inc.
138 Misc. 2d 383 (New York Supreme Court, 1988)
In re the Arbitration between Itoman (U.S.A.), Inc. & Daewoo Corp.
502 N.E.2d 989 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)