MATTER OF WINTHROP v. Goord

810 N.E.2d 907, 2 N.Y.3d 736, 2 N.Y. 736, 778 N.Y.S.2d 455, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 546
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 30, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying summary relief, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order of affirmance, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATTER OF WINTHROP v. Goord, 810 N.E.2d 907, 2 N.Y.3d 736, 2 N.Y. 736, 778 N.Y.S.2d 455, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 546 (N.Y. 2004).

810 N.E.2d 907 (MATTER OF WINTHROP v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Primagency, Inc. v. V-Formation, Inc.
810 N.E.2d 907 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)