Matter of Williams v. New York City Hous. Auth.
This text of 201 N.Y.S.3d 62 (Matter of Williams v. New York City Hous. Auth.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Williams v New York City Hous. Auth. |
| 2024 NY Slip Op 00156 |
| Decided on January 11, 2024 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: January 11, 2024
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Webber, Friedman, Shulman, Rosado, JJ.
Index No. 100176/19 Appeal No. 1325 Case No. 2023-00480
v
New York City Housing Authority, Respondent-Respondent.
Robert M. Williams Jr., appellant pro se.
David Rohde, New York City Housing Authority, New York (Seth E. Kramer of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Bluth, J.), entered June 16, 2022, which granted the motion of respondent New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) to vacate the stay of a prior holdover proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Supreme Court properly lifted the stay of the holdover proceeding. The NYCHA Hearing Officer had a rational basis for its October 13, 2021 determination denying petitioner's application to vacate a default judgment, which had been entered against him in the proceeding. Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for failing to appear at a hearing in that proceeding, nor did he offer a meritorious defense to the underlying charges of chronic rent delinquency and failure to verify income. Therefore, there was no basis to continue the stay (see Matter of Pena v New York City Hous. Auth., 91 AD3d 581, 581-582 [1st Dept 2012]; Matter of Daniels v Popolizio, 171 AD2d 596, 597 [1st Dept 1991]).
We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: January 11, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 N.Y.S.3d 62, 223 A.D.3d 488, 2024 NY Slip Op 00156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-williams-v-new-york-city-hous-auth-nyappdiv-2024.